sprezzature-video
Video claims
A README gets re-read. A number burned into a keyframe does not. This package holds a film’s assertions against the code they describe, in both directions, and answers whether the film can be rendered again at all from a clean clone.
Makes
- WebVTT from the narration script and the measured length of each audio file, not from a transcript and not typed by hand
- A poster baked as frame zero, because Slack, X and Discord regenerate their thumbnail server-side from the first frame whatever a
poster=attribute says - Loudness normalised across a series, so one film is not louder than the next
Audits
verify— every declared claim against the file that would have to change for it to stop being truescan— every number visible on screen that no claim accounts for, because the dangerous claim is the undeclared onepitch— problem, then solution, then underlying magic, in Guy KAWASAKI’s order, with a feature list refused where an insight belongsassets— can this film be rendered again from a clone? Tracked, derived, or exists in exactly one placeprose— the on-screen writing against the project’s charter, one finding per line
Say one of these
The skill triggers itself on phrasing like this, no command to memorize.
make a launch video
the demo video is out of date
verify the claims in this video
re-cut the film
is this number still right
can we rebuild this video
poster frame
Reference library
The knowledge the skill draws on: read them straight from the repo.